Home » FTC lawsuit alleges Roomster owners ripped off roommate seekers with fake listings and evaluations

FTC lawsuit alleges Roomster owners ripped off roommate seekers with fake listings and evaluations

by Mark Dylan


In quick: Attorneys Normal from 6 states joined the Federal Trade Fee (FTC) in a lawsuit versus an application system named Roomster. The criticism accuses the business of “deceptive methods” and outright fraud. Roomster house owners John Shriber and Roman Zaks and AppWinn proprietor Jonathan Martinez are outlined as defendants in the filing.

Roomster is an app available by way of Apple’s Application Store and Google Participate in that supposedly assists men and women uncover roommates or rooms to lease. The FTC promises it is really extremely well-known with university students and other very low-money people today that are unable to moderately find the money for a area on their personal. Consider of it like Zillow, other than for people today wanting to cohabitate with other folks.

On the other hand, the FTC claims that Roomster employed AppWinn’s Jonathan Martinez to put up 1000’s of faux assessments on listings. Furthermore, the criticism alleges that quite a few of the rentals advertised as “genuine, obtainable, and confirmed” are entirely bogus and you should not even exist.

Shriber and Zaks have supposedly raked in “tens of millions of bucks” by charging a price to obtain information and facts on these faux listings.

“Roomster and its homeowners John Shriber and Roman Zaks have taken tens of tens of millions of pounds from mainly reduced-cash flow and university student potential renters who will need dependable housing the most and can least pay for to shed cash,” said the FTC in a Tuesday press release.

To be distinct, Shriber and Zaks are not accused of putting up faux listings themselves. Alternatively, they are not just not vetting qualities submitted to the system, which opens the door for rental frauds. In one particular instance, they marked a rental “verified,” but a straightforward tackle examine unveiled it was a commercial US Post Office environment constructing. As just one legit overview put it:

“Idk of all individuals excellent critiques are fakes way too or what. But I actually achieve out to at least 50-60 men and women and I been given number of msg giving a place. And all of them just bogus. Similar precise e-mail you give the deposit and first thirty day period lease and they will mail you the critical. Result in they ‘at funeral, in different state, traveling, blah blah blah blah.’ [sic]”

Martinez’s purpose was to use his 2,500+ iTunes accounts to load up Roomster’s serious and fake listings with fraudulent reviews the FTC refers to as “testi-phony-als.” The FTC attained email data exhibiting that Roomster had instructed Martinez to “make guaranteed it truly is normally a random variety of critiques, so it looks extra natural.” Roomster sent this interaction immediately after the FTC notified Shriber and Zaks it had opened an investigation into their organization.

Martinez copped a offer to cooperate with investigators and signed a proposed settlement for his element in the fraud. If the court docket indications off, he will be banned from marketing evaluations and have to fork out a $100,000 good. The wonderful will go to the six states stated in the lawsuit — New York, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, and Massachusetts. He have to also notify the App Store and Google Engage in that Roomster paid out him to plant bogus critiques and issue out to them which kinds are his.

The complaint does not specify distinct penalties Rooster and its owners could deal with, only mentioning that their actions violate point out regulations and the Federal Trade Fee Act.

The defendants have not commented on the investigation or its allegations.





Source link